Original Sin & The Problem of Evil

The result is far-reaching and expressed in any number of realities in the average household, organizations, institutions, businesses, and the like. Erickson paints a vivid picture of the reality of the doctrine of the fall, of sin, and of the problem of evil: Sin has enslaved mankind; sin has resulted in an unwillingness to face reality; the attempt to deny sin has resulted in any number of attempt to re-label it; self-deceit, self-centeredness, insensitivity, and restlessness is the order of the day. Lastly, concerning other humans, it is commonplace to experience competition, rejection of authority, loveless persons, and a lack of humility in any given circle.[8]

That said, the study of these three doctrines (fall, sin, evil) has not only resulted in a desire to embrace God’s call to holiness to a greater degree (1 Peter 1:16), but it has engendered a sense of regret for the actions of the first couple and a deep desire to restore a lost relationship with God. God’s desire for his creation was clear from the moment they sinned. He not only provided an immediate solution for the problem of guilt and sin (Genesis 3:21), but along with the curse he also provided a solution (Genesis 3:15), realized in the incarnation (Matthew 1:21).

I call these studies fuel for the mission ahead.

References:

[1]. Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2013), 554.

[2].  Ibid., 550.

[3].  B. Demarest, “Fall of the Human Race,” in Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, ed. Walter A. Elwell, (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2001), 435.

[4]. B. Demarest, “Fall,”  435.

[5]. Ibid., 435.  

[6]. Ibid.

[7]. Ibid.

[8].  Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 561-64.

GoogleImage

Written by Dr. Kevin A. Hall (Monday, July 9, 2018).